home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
112089
/
11208900.019
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
11KB
|
211 lines
<text id=89TT3028>
<title>
Nov. 20, 1989: Festive Film Fare For Thanksgiving
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
Nov. 20, 1989 Freedom!
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
CINEMA, Page 92
Festive Film Fare for Thanksgiving
</hdr><body>
<p>With a Mermaid as hostess, Magnolias on the table -- and a
turkey called Valmont
</p>
<p>By Richard Schickel
</p>
<qt> <l>STEEL MAGNOLIAS</l>
<l>Directed by Herbert Ross</l>
<l>Screenplay by Robert Harling</l>
</qt>
<p> Men have hunting, ball games and bars -- plenty of
opportunities to practice the hearty, necessary rituals of male
bonding. Feminist theory and common sense tell us that women
have a similar need to renew gender loyalties. Their problem,
traditionally, has been finding suitable places and occasions
to do so.
</p>
<p> It was observant of playwright Robert Harling to see that
a small-town beauty parlor can function as a little lodge hall
for women, a place where they can let their hair down while it
is being put up. It was clever of him to stock Steel Magnolias
with Southern belles, wicked of eye and tongue, though
ultimately forgiving of heart. It was shrewd of him to work his
successful off-Broadway drama around personal milestones
(marriage, birth, death) that everyone shares. His characters
may be exotics, but their situations are achingly familiar.
</p>
<p> Above all, it was brave of Harling to place at the center
of what might otherwise have been an episodic comedy the true,
tragic story of his sister, a diabetic who doomed herself to
early death in order to bear a child, and his mother's struggle
to come to terms with that choice. It gives the piece the
dramatic focus and the emotional weight it requires.
</p>
<p> The play was a swell show; it had something for everyone.
The main thing preventing it from being an equally swell movie
is the fact that it is a movie. A film must offer us something
a little more spectacular than half a dozen white chicks sitting
around talking. Accordingly, Harling's adaptation hustles them
out of the beauty shop and into the life of the town. Suddenly
the people they talked about so amusingly behind their backs
must be met face-to-face. The conflicts and confusions that
sounded so hilarious in the recounting are spread out
realistically. And reality, as we know, is never that amusing
when confronted head on.
</p>
<p> The stylized bitchiness of Harling's writing requires a
stage setting. Failing that, it requires a director willing to
let his actors throw good lines away or overlap them in ways
that work in the movie's naturalistic context. But Herbert Ross
insists on theatricality. His editing even provides awkward
little pauses for the audience to fill with laughter, just as
if this were still a play. As a result, some very good
performers (Shirley MacLaine, Olympia Dukakis, Daryl Hannah,
Dolly Parton) function less as full-scale sorority sisters than
as chorus members who elbow their way up front in a crowd of
even sketchier characters.
</p>
<p> The film's center lies in the bond between Julia Roberts as
the young woman serenely accepting the risk of childbirth and
Sally Field as her tightly wound mother, wanting to scream
warnings at her daughter but only able to whisper despairing
support for her -- right through the final coma. Their
characters are fully and finely realized, and their work is
supported, not subverted, by the style and mood of a film that
cries more easily, and more persuasively, than it laughs.
</p>
<qt> <l>VALMONT</l>
<l>Directed by Milos Forman</l>
<l>Screenplay by Jean-Claude Carriere</l>
</qt>
<p> Call it by its rightful name, Les Liaisons Dangereuses.
Call it Dangerous Liaisons. Call it, if you must, Valmont. But
in any case it looks as if we can now call it a day for stage
and movie adaptations of Pierre-Ambroise-Francois Choderlos de
Laclos's intricate, instructive novel of sexual gamesmanship
among the 18th century French aristocracy. For Milos Forman and
Jean-Claude Carriere, while fiddling with the plot of this
deliciously nasty tale, have studiously embalmed its spirit.
Valmont arrives stiffened by the elegant, inert formalism of
Forman's direction, and chilled by Carriere's all too sober
respect for his source and by their mutual determination to
apply modern psychological understanding to the behavior of the
principal figures.
</p>
<p> The script is almost clinically clear about why the
Marquise de Merteuil (Annette Bening) and the Vicomte de Valmont
(Colin Firth) embark on a campaign to debauch a 15-year-old
virgin, Cecile de Volanges (Fairuza Balk). The older woman is
gripped by temporary insanity because she loves the man who
intends to marry the adolescent. The vicomte too has his
excuses. He is possessed by a passionate nature, the ill effects
of which, it is implied, are also temporary. Give the kid some
time, and he will probably turn out to be an admirable citizen.
Indeed, his second amorous campaign -- to bed a virtuous young
wife, Madame de Tourvel (Meg Tilly) -- is not presented as idle
and amoral womanizing but as proof of his capacity for authentic
emotion. Too bad he has what we now are fond of calling "an
intimacy problem," and, as a result, this affair and ultimately
his life come to a bad and premature end.
</p>
<p> How could anyone think it helpful to impose upon the
behavior of a long-lost era and a vanished social class the
wisdom of modern Pop psychology? It prevents the actors from
tearing into their roles with the black comic gusto that Glenn
Close and John Malkovich brought to their feverish performances
in Dangerous Liaisons last year. But besides spoiling the fun,
this approach blurs the work's value as a cautionary tale,
capable of reminding us that motiveless malignity is a potent
force in every age and one that not even Freud -- let alone
humanistically inclined moviemakers -- can explain away.
</p>
<p>FESTIVAL FILM FARE FOR THANKSGIVING
</p>
<p> These days, nearly every popular movie wants to be a
cartoon. For proof, check out 1989's five top hits: Batman;
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade; Lethal Weapon 2; Honey, I
Shrunk the Kids; Ghostbusters II. They all aspire to the freedom
of form and story that any animated film takes for granted.
Problem is, real life gets in the way. Location shooting is at
the whim of weather; special effects can look chintzy onscreen.
And actors! They cost the moon, and their bodies aren't elastic
enough to perform the comic contortions that Daffy Duck can give
you with the wave of an animator's pen. So here's a tip for the
'90s, Hollywood: junk the live-action movie. Just make cartoons.
</p>
<p> Disney and Don Bluth can lead the way. Walt Disney, after
all, created the genre, turning barnyard animals into superstars
and a Sunday-supplement curiosity into the movie's most
enduring subspecies. Bluth, a Disney renegade, showed his old
masters that the cartoon possessed a social vitality for the
'80s. Bluth's The Secret of NIMH was a parable on animal
experimentation; An American Tail found much to say,
endearingly, about melting-pot prejudice; The Land Before Time
found love and death among the dinosaurs. Now Disney and Bluth
have launched a welcome new Thanksgiving tradition, each
producing a feature cartoon for the rescue of baby-sitters and
the beguilement of the child in every moviegoer.
</p>
<p> In All Dogs Go to Heaven, Bluth takes a vacation from
portent and dips into anecdote. Listen for familiar echoes
(Little Miss Marker, Heaven Can Wait, even Disney's 1988 cartoon
Oliver & Company) in the story of Charlie, a German shepherd who
is reprieved from death and befriends a little girl kidnaped by
his scurvy old gang. Visually, the picture is swathed in
Bluth's trademark golden browns and moody blues. Aurally, it's
a reunion of the Burt Pack: Burt Reynolds is the voice of
Charlie, Loni Anderson is the moll Flo, the exuberantly
flustered Dom DeLuise is Charlie's pal Itchy. All Dogs dawdles
a bit, but it offers the requisite charm and a poignant moral:
some things, like friendship and honor, are worth dying for.
</p>
<p> The end of The Little Mermaid wrestles with no such
ambiguities. It comes with flourishes, a rainbow and a perfect
kiss -- full heartstring accompaniment. But from the first
frame, Disney's suave storytellers cue you to wonderment in
their adaptation of the Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale.
Ariel is a mermaid princess with a teenager's yen to travel
beyond her world and become part of the forbidden one above. To
her father, King Triton of the Mer-people, humans are
"spineless, savage, harpooning fish eaters." To Ariel they are
skyrockets and sea chanteys and buried treasure -- the thrilling
unknown. Then she spies hunky, lonely Prince Eric, and it's
impossible love at first sight. For Eric, when he is saved by
the mermaid and nursed by her caressing song, it's love at first
sound. A cross-species Romeo and Juliet: boy meets gill.
</p>
<p> Around these mismatched romancers, writer-directors John
Musker and Ron Clements have assembled enough entertaining
creatures to stock a theme park. Sebastian the crab (voiced by
Samuel E. Wright) is a Caribbean Jiminy Cricket, fussing
avuncularly over Ariel but bound to break into calypso croon.
Louis the French chef (Rene Auberjonois) brings sadistic elan
to his dicing, flaying and serving of les poissons. Ursula (Pat
Carroll) the sea witch is a fat, shimmying squid with malefic
revenge in mind -- the sort of Disney horror queen who has given
kids nightmares for a half-century. All these characters are
given witty, hummable pop songs by Howard Ashman and Alan Menken
(the Little Shop of Horrors team), a reminder that the Hollywood
cartoon has become the last, best refuge of the Broadway
musical.
</p>
<p> The film's vocal, musical and painterly talents mesh
ecstatically in the big water-ballet production number Under
the Sea. As Sebastian limns the aquatic virtues, a Noah's
aquarium of sea creatures animates a joyous Busby Berkeley
palette. If ever a cartoon earned a standing ovation in
mid-film, this would be it. But the whole movie is canny magic.
For 82 minutes, The Little Mermaid reclaims the movie house as
a dream palace and the big screen as a window into enchantment.
Live-action filmmakers, see this and try to top it. Go on and
try.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>